Unitree
Unitree

Unitree

  1. 2 out of 5

    (Guest)

    I bought the basic version hoping to hack my own hands onto it. The interface is not as open as claimed. Disappointed.

  2. 5 out of 5

    (Guest)

    The dual encoder and low inertia motors allow for incredible precision.

  3. 4 out of 5

    (Guest)

    We use this for promotional events. The 'Iron Fist King' moves and agility are a fantastic spectacle to show clients.

  4. 3 out of 5

    (Guest)

    Bought the Gantry for safe testing. It was a necessary but annoying extra cost. More safety should be standard.

  5. 5 out of 5

    (Guest)

    Secondary development support is exactly what we needed for custom scripting.

  6. 1 out of 5

    (Guest)

    2kg arm load capacity is a joke. Needs more torque for any actual industrial logistics.

  7. 4 out of 5

    (Guest)

    The UnifoLM is a promising start for control. We are optimistic about the future of its AI capabilities.

  8. 1 out of 5

    (Guest)

    The base model is useless without hands or the compute module. The actual price for a functional tool is misleadingly high.

  9. 5 out of 5

    (Guest)

    Incredible speed and agility. Perfect for dynamic motion algorithm development.

  10. 5 out of 5

    (Guest)

    We bought the EDU Ultimate for the tactile hands. Precision for small-part assembly is fantastic. Excellent value compared to competitors.

  11. 2 out of 5

    (Guest)

    Battery life is a major issue. Two hours of operation is simply not enough for our testing cycles.

  12. 5 out of 5

    (Guest)

    For the price, this is the most accessible full-sized R&D platform available. The $16k entry point democratizes robotics research. A game-changer for universities.

  13. 3 out of 5

    (Guest)

    Great for the price!

  14. 5 out of 5

    (Guest)

    Love it!

  15. 4 out of 5

    (Guest)

    Compact and easy to manage.

  16. 4 out of 5

    (Guest)

    Great for research

  17. 5 out of 5

    (Guest)

    Works Perfectly

  18. 2 out of 5

    (Guest)

    Hate the way it looks

  19. 4 out of 5

    Upon testing can confirm its capabilities but not ease of use.

  20. 5 out of 5

    Love seeing stuff like this