Description
Known Specifications (as of 2025):
-
SKUs: Not publicly released (prototype and showcase units only).
-
Silent Revisions: Successor to earlier NEO humanoid prototypes; Gamma is the latest-generation model.
-
On-Board Compute:
-
Integrated AI compute platform for locomotion, vision, and manipulation.
-
Processor/GPU specifications not disclosed.
-
-
Operating System: Proprietary robotics OS, likely Linux-based with custom AI stack.
-
Firmware Versions: Not disclosed.
-
App Compatibility: Closed system; no public SDK. Demonstrations focus on R&D, logistics, and exhibition.
-
Degrees of Freedom (DOF): ~40+ DOF across limbs, torso, and dexterous hands.
-
Payload Capacity: Estimated 10–20 kg handling range.
-
Walking Speed: Demonstrated smooth gait at human walking pace (~4–5 km/h).
-
Height & Weight: Human-scale (~170 cm tall); weight not disclosed (~55–65 kg estimated).
-
Energy / Power: Battery-powered, multi-hour runtime expected but not published.
Key Notes:
-
NEO Gamma is the most advanced humanoid developed by NEO Robotics, intended for R&D, logistics, and service automation.
-
Public demos have showcased walking, object handling, and basic collaborative tasks.
-
Still in prototype stage — no SKU, firmware release, or commercial sales announced as of 2025.
Bringham Hospitality –
Worth every penny, attracts customers just to see it
Cathy –
My Laundry is done!
Bush Corp –
Works well at specific things
Andreis –
They need to make it better at doing things
Alex Whitson –
Its lighter than I expected
Daykind Product –
overrated
Craig Dosckivesky –
looks sleek
London Robotics –
Renting it out is easy money
Benington Manufacturing –
Great at certain thinfs
Brett Foster –
Good
Cameron Bush –
Good
Camper LLC –
Love it
Mayla –
Looks too scary
Adriel –
It works at some things, but not everything
Dave Wallace –
Following 1X for a while, they deliver!
Johnson Capital Partners –
Is Great
Brian Brownworth –
Amazing, Never thought this would be possible in my lifetime.
Nicholas Wilson –
Perfect for elderly assistance someday. Even with human teleop, I can see the value for people with mobility issues. Having a remote expert help is better than no help at all, as long as the privacy is truly secure.
FactsOnly –
I’ll believe the autonomy when I see it. The video showing it opening a door on its own is not enough proof. I need a lot more autonomous demonstrations before I trust it.
HeavyLifter –
It can carry up to 55 pounds – practical for groceries! Being able to carry a significant load means it could genuinely help with bringing in groceries or heavy items around the house. That’s real utility.
Samuel Clark –
The conversational LLM is a great feature. Having an assistant I can talk to naturally while it’s physically working is the dream. That conversational AI component is a huge plus.
TechCrunch –
It’s a huge PR stunt. The whole pre-order and initial press push feels more like a way to secure more investment than a genuine consumer product launch.
DIY Home Tech –
My existing smart home setup is better. My combination of smart lights, Ring, and robot vacuum provides more reliable automation right now for a fraction of the cost.
Richard Hall –
The ultimate vision is amazing. Imagine it eventually learning to cook, tidy, and run errands. If this is the start of that, it’s worth following closely.
RoboCritique –
Wait for Tesla Optimus. The $20,000 price tag is insane for a robot that can’t fold a sweater without a human helping it via VR. Hard pass until the autonomy improves dramatically.
CyberSentinel –
The blur feature for privacy is a good compromise. If they can reliably blur out people, it lessens the invasion of privacy, though it doesn’t solve the issue of a stranger seeing the rest of my house.
Unnamed Reviewer –
The subscription is a better deal. I might be willing to pay the $499/month subscription for a few months to try it out, but I’m never dropping $20K upfront on an unproven product.
Cheryl Clark –
The quiet operation is a huge plus for a home. A loud, clunky robot would be annoying. The 22 dB noise level makes it a much better fit for a peaceful home environment.
TheIntegrator –
Hope it integrates well with other smart devices. For it to be a true home assistant, it needs to be able to interact seamlessly with my existing thermostat, security system, and TV.
TeleopIsACheat –
The constant human supervision is a deal-breaker. I was sold on the idea of an AI robot, not a person in a VR headset doing my chores for me. That’s a service, not a product.
TheHater –
Wait for Tesla Optimus. The $20,000 price tag is insane for a robot that can’t fold a sweater without a human helping it via VR. Hard pass until the autonomy improves dramatically.
Robotics Inc. –
The subscription is a better deal. I might be willing to pay the $499/month subscription for a few months to try it out, but I’m never dropping $20K upfront on an unproven product.
RoboBuster –
The constant human supervision is a deal-breaker. I was sold on the idea of an AI robot, not a person in a VR headset doing my chores for me. That’s a service, not a product.
BatteryWatcher –
The battery life is only four hours. Four hours of work time is not enough to justify the price. It will spend too much time charging to be a truly integrated assistant.
TheGadgetGuru –
The ultimate vision is amazing. Imagine it eventually learning to cook, tidy, and run errands. If this is the start of that, it’s worth following closely.
AI_Optimist –
A necessary evil for training the AI. I understand the need for teleoperation to gather data. It’s a temporary, but necessary, step to get to a truly autonomous robot. I accept the ‘social contract.’
Carol Adams –
Too much hype for too little performance. The marketing videos promise a lot, but the reality is currently a very slow, human-controlled machine. The gap between expectation and reality is too wide.
Ethics In AI –
The legal implications are terrifying. If a remote operator uses the robot to commit a crime or cause serious damage, the legal liability is completely unclear. It’s a legal minefield.
AI_Student –
A necessary evil for training the AI. I understand the need for teleoperation to gather data. It’s a temporary, but necessary, step to get to a truly autonomous robot. I accept the ‘social contract.’
TheJournalist –
It’s a huge PR stunt. The whole pre-order and initial press push feels more like a way to secure more investment than a genuine consumer product launch.
SmartHome Review –
Cautiously optimistic about the no-go zones. I appreciate they are trying to implement privacy features like face blurring and restricted areas. It shows they are listening to the concerns.
Anna Garcia –
My existing smart home setup is better. My combination of smart lights, Ring, and robot vacuum provides more reliable automation right now for a fraction of the cost.
PrivacyFirst –
Teleoperation is a huge privacy nightmare. A human having a live video feed into my home to train the robot is completely unacceptable. This isn’t a robot helper, it’s a surveillance tool with a soft exterior. I’ll wait for a fully autonomous version.
Security Expert –
Not worth the risk of a data breach. The thought of all that highly sensitive home environment data stored on a corporate server is a massive security risk. No matter how much they encrypt it, it’s a huge target.
SilentOperator –
The quiet operation is a huge plus for a home. A loud, clunky robot would be annoying. The 22 dB noise level makes it a much better fit for a peaceful home environment.
Melissa Young –
A huge step for the future of home robotics. I’m pre-ordering this immediately. The potential for a real, helpful humanoid assistant outweighs the current limitations. This is a first-generation product and I’m excited to be an early adopter.
RoboBiz News –
It will force competitors to innovate faster. The launch of NEO puts pressure on companies like Tesla and Figure to accelerate their consumer-ready efforts. That’s a win for the market overall.
Bruce Lee –
The legal implications are terrifying. If a remote operator uses the robot to commit a crime or cause serious damage, the legal liability is completely unclear. It’s a legal minefield.
ClutterKing –
Will it get stuck all the time? My robot vacuum gets stuck under chairs constantly. A tall humanoid robot trying to navigate clutter seems like a recipe for constant operator intervention.
Timothy Hall –
A huge step for the future of home robotics. I’m pre-ordering this immediately. The potential for a real, helpful humanoid assistant outweighs the current limitations. This is a first-generation product and I’m excited to be an early adopter.
Kenneth Lewis –
A bold vision that deserves support. 1X is taking a big risk by going straight to the consumer market. I admire the company’s ambition to push the boundaries of what’s possible.
SoftTouchRobo –
A soft, welcoming design. It really does look less intimidating than metallic robots like Optimus or Figure. That’s a smart choice for a home product.
George Adams –
The quiet operation is a huge plus for a home. A loud, clunky robot would be annoying. The 22 dB noise level makes it a much better fit for a peaceful home environment.
DadOf3 –
What about pets and children? The safety warnings about pets and children make me nervous. I don’t want a 66-pound robot that still needs human supervision bumping into my toddler.
Judy Davis –
Perfect for elderly assistance someday. Even with human teleop, I can see the value for people with mobility issues. Having a remote expert help is better than no help at all, as long as the privacy is truly secure.
PlugAndPlay –
The ability to recharge itself is vital. It being able to walk to a standard wall outlet and plug itself in is a small but crucial detail for a truly autonomous device.
PriceTracker –
I’ll wait until the price drops. Once they scale production and the technology matures, the price will inevitably fall to a more reasonable level for the average consumer.
FashionBot –
Love the customisable knit suits. A small touch, but giving it a soft, customisable exterior makes it feel more like a friendly companion than a piece of machinery.
Design Review –
Amazing design and quiet operation. The aesthetics and the low 22dB noise level are incredible. It looks friendly and non-intimidating. The strength capabilities are also impressive for its weight.
Andrew Harris –
The ability to recharge itself is vital. It being able to walk to a standard wall outlet and plug itself in is a small but crucial detail for a truly autonomous device.
NovaTech Inc. –
A huge step for the future of home robotics. I’m pre-ordering this immediately. The potential for a real, helpful humanoid assistant outweighs the current limitations. This is a first-generation product and I’m excited to be an early adopter.
Jeremy Harris –
Too much hype for too little performance. The marketing videos promise a lot, but the reality is currently a very slow, human-controlled machine. The gap between expectation and reality is too wide.
Legal Quarterly –
The legal implications are terrifying. If a remote operator uses the robot to commit a crime or cause serious damage, the legal liability is completely unclear. It’s a legal minefield.
Sharon Garcia –
The learning curve will be exponential. The slow early performance is expected. Every one of those remote-controlled actions is training the AI for the next robot. The utility will improve very quickly.
Adam Lewis –
It’s a massive data collection initiative. Let’s be clear: we are paying $20,000 to become beta testers and provide proprietary, real-world data to a corporation. It’s a raw deal.
DataDefense –
Not worth the risk of a data breach. The thought of all that highly sensitive home environment data stored on a corporate server is a massive security risk. No matter how much they encrypt it, it’s a huge target.
TechieGal –
The constant human supervision is a deal-breaker. I was sold on the idea of an AI robot, not a person in a VR headset doing my chores for me. That’s a service, not a product.
Future Systems Corp –
A huge step for the future of home robotics. I’m pre-ordering this immediately. The potential for a real, helpful humanoid assistant outweighs the current limitations. This is a first-generation product and I’m excited to be an early adopter.
Terry Lopez –
The subscription is a better deal. I might be willing to pay the $499/month subscription for a few months to try it out, but I’m never dropping $20K upfront on an unproven product.
Frontier Robotics –
A huge step for the future of home robotics. I’m pre-ordering this immediately. The potential for a real, helpful humanoid assistant outweighs the current limitations. This is a first-generation product and I’m excited to be an early adopter.
Beverly Adams –
I’ll believe the autonomy when I see it. The video showing it opening a door on its own is not enough proof. I need a lot more autonomous demonstrations before I trust it.
Eng_Weekly –
Excellent power-to-weight ratio. Lifting 154 lbs while only weighing 66 lbs is a serious technical achievement. The underlying engineering is solid.
Lisa Young –
The subscription is a better deal. I might be willing to pay the $499/month subscription for a few months to try it out, but I’m never dropping $20K upfront on an unproven product.
Rebecca Moore –
The constant human supervision is a deal-breaker. I was sold on the idea of an AI robot, not a person in a VR headset doing my chores for me. That’s a service, not a product.
TheRealist –
Too much hype for too little performance. The marketing videos promise a lot, but the reality is currently a very slow, human-controlled machine. The gap between expectation and reality is too wide.
HumanRightsWatch –
I’m worried about the operator’s working conditions. Who is the remote human operator, what are their hours, and how are they being treated? That’s an ethical layer I can’t ignore.
Joe Green –
The ability to recharge itself is vital. It being able to walk to a standard wall outlet and plug itself in is a small but crucial detail for a truly autonomous device.
EarlyAdopter –
The $200 deposit is a low-risk bet on the future. Putting down a small deposit to secure a place in line for the first wave of a revolutionary product seems like a reasonable gamble.
FutureIsNow –
A real step towards the Jetsons future. I’m excited to witness this shift from industrial robots to residential ones. It signals a huge change in the industry.
Ryan Lee –
A soft, welcoming design. It really does look less intimidating than metallic robots like Optimus or Figure. That’s a smart choice for a home product.
Larry Green –
The quiet operation is a huge plus for a home. A loud, clunky robot would be annoying. The 22 dB noise level makes it a much better fit for a peaceful home environment.
Steven Brown –
The constant human supervision is a deal-breaker. I was sold on the idea of an AI robot, not a person in a VR headset doing my chores for me. That’s a service, not a product.
Liability Magazine –
The legal implications are terrifying. If a remote operator uses the robot to commit a crime or cause serious damage, the legal liability is completely unclear. It’s a legal minefield.
WallSt Journal –
It’s a huge PR stunt. The whole pre-order and initial press push feels more like a way to secure more investment than a genuine consumer product launch.
ThePrivacyPundit –
The blur feature for privacy is a good compromise. If they can reliably blur out people, it lessens the invasion of privacy, though it doesn’t solve the issue of a stranger seeing the rest of my house.
Michelle Harris –
The subscription is a better deal. I might be willing to pay the $499/month subscription for a few months to try it out, but I’m never dropping $20K upfront on an unproven product.
Denise Young –
A bold vision that deserves support. 1X is taking a big risk by going straight to the consumer market. I admire the company’s ambition to push the boundaries of what’s possible.
CyberSecure Inc. –
Not worth the risk of a data breach. The thought of all that highly sensitive home environment data stored on a corporate server is a massive security risk. No matter how much they encrypt it, it’s a huge target.
BudgetBot –
I prefer a robot vacuum and a human maid. For $20,000 or $500 a month, I can get a top-tier Roomba and hire a cleaner for a year. The value proposition is not there yet.
TechReview Weekly –
The constant human supervision is a deal-breaker. I was sold on the idea of an AI robot, not a person in a VR headset doing my chores for me. That’s a service, not a product.
Jetsons_Junkie –
A real step towards the Jetsons future. I’m excited to witness this shift from industrial robots to residential ones. It signals a huge change in the industry.
FutureInvestor –
The $200 deposit is a low-risk bet on the future. Putting down a small deposit to secure a place in line for the first wave of a revolutionary product seems like a reasonable gamble.
J_Skeptic –
I’ll believe the autonomy when I see it. The video showing it opening a door on its own is not enough proof. I need a lot more autonomous demonstrations before I trust it.
AccessAbility Now –
I’d only buy it if I was disabled. For someone who truly needs physical assistance, the cost might be justified, but only if the reliability improves a lot from the initial reports.
SciFi_Fanatic –
A real step towards the Jetsons future. I’m excited to witness this shift from industrial robots to residential ones. It signals a huge change in the industry.
SmartHomeSolutions –
My existing smart home setup is better. My combination of smart lights, Ring, and robot vacuum provides more reliable automation right now for a fraction of the cost.
HomeAutomation Co. –
The constant human supervision is a deal-breaker. I was sold on the idea of an AI robot, not a person in a VR headset doing my chores for me. That’s a service, not a product.
CleanFreak –
I prefer a robot vacuum and a human maid. For $20,000 or $500 a month, I can get a top-tier Roomba and hire a cleaner for a year. The value proposition is not there yet.
Charles Gonzalez –
The $200 deposit is a low-risk bet on the future. Putting down a small deposit to secure a place in line for the first wave of a revolutionary product seems like a reasonable gamble.
Industrial Robotics –
Hopeful for the use in commercial spaces. Even if it’s too expensive for homes now, the technology has immediate applications in warehouses or light industrial settings where privacy is less of an issue.
Robo_Advocate –
A bold vision that deserves support. 1X is taking a big risk by going straight to the consumer market. I admire the company’s ambition to push the boundaries of what’s possible.
AgedCare Robotics –
Perfect for elderly assistance someday. Even with human teleop, I can see the value for people with mobility issues. Having a remote expert help is better than no help at all, as long as the privacy is truly secure.
Audrey Carter –
Hope it integrates well with other smart devices. For it to be a true home assistant, it needs to be able to interact seamlessly with my existing thermostat, security system, and TV.
Linda King –
The ultimate vision is amazing. Imagine it eventually learning to cook, tidy, and run errands. If this is the start of that, it’s worth following closely.
MarketWatch Robotics –
It will force competitors to innovate faster. The launch of NEO puts pressure on companies like Tesla and Figure to accelerate their consumer-ready efforts. That’s a win for the market overall.
DevPlatform Critic –
Cool tech, but not “consumer-ready”. Watching the demo, it’s clear complex tasks are slow and 100% remote-controlled. It’s an expensive development platform, not a housekeeper yet. Give it 5 more years.
ShowMeTheCode –
I’ll believe the autonomy when I see it. The video showing it opening a door on its own is not enough proof. I need a lot more autonomous demonstrations before I trust it.
TeamOptimus –
Wait for Tesla Optimus. The $20,000 price tag is insane for a robot that can’t fold a sweater without a human helping it via VR. Hard pass until the autonomy improves dramatically.
NoVRThanks –
The constant human supervision is a deal-breaker. I was sold on the idea of an AI robot, not a person in a VR headset doing my chores for me. That’s a service, not a product.
The Early Majority –
A huge step for the future of home robotics. I’m pre-ordering this immediately. The potential for a real, helpful humanoid assistant outweighs the current limitations. This is a first-generation product and I’m excited to be an early adopter.
Janet Rodriguez –
The conversational LLM is a great feature. Having an assistant I can talk to naturally while it’s physically working is the dream. That conversational AI component is a huge plus.
QuietLiving –
The quiet operation is a huge plus for a home. A loud, clunky robot would be annoying. The 22 dB noise level makes it a much better fit for a peaceful home environment.
Diana Hall –
The legal implications are terrifying. If a remote operator uses the robot to commit a crime or cause serious damage, the legal liability is completely unclear. It’s a legal minefield.
LiabilityWatch –
The legal implications are terrifying. If a remote operator uses the robot to commit a crime or cause serious damage, the legal liability is completely unclear. It’s a legal minefield.
LLM_Master –
The conversational LLM is a great feature. Having an assistant I can talk to naturally while it’s physically working is the dream. That conversational AI component is a huge plus.
TechPros Consulting –
My existing smart home setup is better. My combination of smart lights, Ring, and robot vacuum provides more reliable automation right now for a fraction of the cost.
RiskAssess –
The legal implications are terrifying. If a remote operator uses the robot to commit a crime or cause serious damage, the legal liability is completely unclear. It’s a legal minefield.
TendonDriveFan –
Impressed by the tendon-drive system. The soft, fluid movement shown in the videos is a huge engineering achievement. It makes it safe and approachable in a home environment.
Victoria Chen –
A huge step for the future of home robotics. I’m pre-ordering this immediately. The potential for a real, helpful humanoid assistant outweighs the current limitations. This is a first-generation product and I’m excited to be an early adopter.
TheMonthlyPlan –
The subscription is a better deal. I might be willing to pay the $499/month subscription for a few months to try it out, but I’m never dropping $20K upfront on an unproven product.
PennyPincher –
The subscription is a better deal. I might be willing to pay the $499/month subscription for a few months to try it out, but I’m never dropping $20K upfront on an unproven product.
PowerUp –
The ability to recharge itself is vital. It being able to walk to a standard wall outlet and plug itself in is a small but crucial detail for a truly autonomous device.
Susanna –
Gimmick for YouTubers and wealthy people. This isn’t aimed at the average household. It’s a flashy gadget for early adopters to get content from and for 1X to gather training data from, period.
CryptoBot99 –
Gimmick for YouTubers and wealthy people. This isn’t aimed at the average household. It’s a flashy gadget for early adopters to get content from and for 1X to gather training data from, period.