Love the customisable knit suits. A small touch, but giving it a soft, customisable exterior makes it feel more like a friendly companion than a piece of machinery.
I'd only buy it if I was disabled. For someone who truly needs physical assistance, the cost might be justified, but only if the reliability improves a lot from the initial reports.
The legal implications are terrifying. If a remote operator uses the robot to commit a crime or cause serious damage, the legal liability is completely unclear. It's a legal minefield.
A real step towards the Jetsons future. I'm excited to witness this shift from industrial robots to residential ones. It signals a huge change in the industry.
I'll believe the autonomy when I see it. The video showing it opening a door on its own is not enough proof. I need a lot more autonomous demonstrations before I trust it.
The ability to recharge itself is vital. It being able to walk to a standard wall outlet and plug itself in is a small but crucial detail for a truly autonomous device.
The blur feature for privacy is a good compromise. If they can reliably blur out people, it lessens the invasion of privacy, though it doesn't solve the issue of a stranger seeing the rest of my house.
What about pets and children? The safety warnings about pets and children make me nervous. I don't want a 66-pound robot that still needs human supervision bumping into my toddler.
Hope it integrates well with other smart devices. For it to be a true home assistant, it needs to be able to interact seamlessly with my existing thermostat, security system, and TV.
My existing smart home setup is better. My combination of smart lights, Ring, and robot vacuum provides more reliable automation right now for a fraction of the cost.
The subscription is a better deal. I might be willing to pay the $499/month subscription for a few months to try it out, but I'm never dropping $20K upfront on an unproven product.
The battery life is only four hours. Four hours of work time is not enough to justify the price. It will spend too much time charging to be a truly integrated assistant.
A bold vision that deserves support. 1X is taking a big risk by going straight to the consumer market. I admire the company's ambition to push the boundaries of what's possible.
The conversational LLM is a great feature. Having an assistant I can talk to naturally while it's physically working is the dream. That conversational AI component is a huge plus.
The legal implications are terrifying. If a remote operator uses the robot to commit a crime or cause serious damage, the legal liability is completely unclear. It's a legal minefield.
The constant human supervision is a deal-breaker. I was sold on the idea of an AI robot, not a person in a VR headset doing my chores for me. That's a service, not a product.
A real step towards the Jetsons future. I'm excited to witness this shift from industrial robots to residential ones. It signals a huge change in the industry.
I'll believe the autonomy when I see it. The video showing it opening a door on its own is not enough proof. I need a lot more autonomous demonstrations before I trust it.
The quiet operation is a huge plus for a home. A loud, clunky robot would be annoying. The 22 dB noise level makes it a much better fit for a peaceful home environment.
Please note:
This action will also remove this member from your connections and send a report to the site admin.
Please allow a few minutes for this process to complete.
FashionBot (Guest) –
Love the customisable knit suits. A small touch, but giving it a soft, customisable exterior makes it feel more like a friendly companion than a piece of machinery.
AccessAbility Now (Guest) –
I'd only buy it if I was disabled. For someone who truly needs physical assistance, the cost might be justified, but only if the reliability improves a lot from the initial reports.
Diana Hall (Guest) –
The legal implications are terrifying. If a remote operator uses the robot to commit a crime or cause serious damage, the legal liability is completely unclear. It's a legal minefield.
FutureIsNow (Guest) –
A real step towards the Jetsons future. I'm excited to witness this shift from industrial robots to residential ones. It signals a huge change in the industry.
Beverly Adams (Guest) –
I'll believe the autonomy when I see it. The video showing it opening a door on its own is not enough proof. I need a lot more autonomous demonstrations before I trust it.
Joe Green (Guest) –
The ability to recharge itself is vital. It being able to walk to a standard wall outlet and plug itself in is a small but crucial detail for a truly autonomous device.
ThePrivacyPundit (Guest) –
The blur feature for privacy is a good compromise. If they can reliably blur out people, it lessens the invasion of privacy, though it doesn't solve the issue of a stranger seeing the rest of my house.
DadOf3 (Guest) –
What about pets and children? The safety warnings about pets and children make me nervous. I don't want a 66-pound robot that still needs human supervision bumping into my toddler.
Audrey Carter (Guest) –
Hope it integrates well with other smart devices. For it to be a true home assistant, it needs to be able to interact seamlessly with my existing thermostat, security system, and TV.
TechPros Consulting (Guest) –
My existing smart home setup is better. My combination of smart lights, Ring, and robot vacuum provides more reliable automation right now for a fraction of the cost.
Eng_Weekly (Guest) –
Excellent power-to-weight ratio. Lifting 154 lbs while only weighing 66 lbs is a serious technical achievement. The underlying engineering is solid.
Terry Lopez (Guest) –
The subscription is a better deal. I might be willing to pay the $499/month subscription for a few months to try it out, but I'm never dropping $20K upfront on an unproven product.
BatteryWatcher (Guest) –
The battery life is only four hours. Four hours of work time is not enough to justify the price. It will spend too much time charging to be a truly integrated assistant.
Robo_Advocate (Guest) –
A bold vision that deserves support. 1X is taking a big risk by going straight to the consumer market. I admire the company's ambition to push the boundaries of what's possible.
Janet Rodriguez (Guest) –
The conversational LLM is a great feature. Having an assistant I can talk to naturally while it's physically working is the dream. That conversational AI component is a huge plus.
Bruce Lee (Guest) –
The legal implications are terrifying. If a remote operator uses the robot to commit a crime or cause serious damage, the legal liability is completely unclear. It's a legal minefield.
TechReview Weekly (Guest) –
The constant human supervision is a deal-breaker. I was sold on the idea of an AI robot, not a person in a VR headset doing my chores for me. That's a service, not a product.
Jetsons_Junkie (Guest) –
A real step towards the Jetsons future. I'm excited to witness this shift from industrial robots to residential ones. It signals a huge change in the industry.
FactsOnly (Guest) –
I'll believe the autonomy when I see it. The video showing it opening a door on its own is not enough proof. I need a lot more autonomous demonstrations before I trust it.
Larry Green (Guest) –
The quiet operation is a huge plus for a home. A loud, clunky robot would be annoying. The 22 dB noise level makes it a much better fit for a peaceful home environment.