The legal implications are terrifying. If a remote operator uses the robot to commit a crime or cause serious damage, the legal liability is completely unclear. It's a legal minefield.
Not worth the risk of a data breach. The thought of all that highly sensitive home environment data stored on a corporate server is a massive security risk. No matter how much they encrypt it, it's a huge target.
A huge step for the future of home robotics. I'm pre-ordering this immediately. The potential for a real, helpful humanoid assistant outweighs the current limitations. This is a first-generation product and I'm excited to be an early adopter.
The quiet operation is a huge plus for a home. A loud, clunky robot would be annoying. The 22 dB noise level makes it a much better fit for a peaceful home environment.
The ability to recharge itself is vital. It being able to walk to a standard wall outlet and plug itself in is a small but crucial detail for a truly autonomous device.
The legal implications are terrifying. If a remote operator uses the robot to commit a crime or cause serious damage, the legal liability is completely unclear. It's a legal minefield.
The constant human supervision is a deal-breaker. I was sold on the idea of an AI robot, not a person in a VR headset doing my chores for me. That's a service, not a product.
It's a huge PR stunt. The whole pre-order and initial press push feels more like a way to secure more investment than a genuine consumer product launch.
The subscription is a better deal. I might be willing to pay the $499/month subscription for a few months to try it out, but I'm never dropping $20K upfront on an unproven product.
Hopeful for the use in commercial spaces. Even if it's too expensive for homes now, the technology has immediate applications in warehouses or light industrial settings where privacy is less of an issue.
The legal implications are terrifying. If a remote operator uses the robot to commit a crime or cause serious damage, the legal liability is completely unclear. It's a legal minefield.
The conversational LLM is a great feature. Having an assistant I can talk to naturally while it's physically working is the dream. That conversational AI component is a huge plus.
The constant human supervision is a deal-breaker. I was sold on the idea of an AI robot, not a person in a VR headset doing my chores for me. That's a service, not a product.
A necessary evil for training the AI. I understand the need for teleoperation to gather data. It's a temporary, but necessary, step to get to a truly autonomous robot. I accept the 'social contract.'
Too much hype for too little performance. The marketing videos promise a lot, but the reality is currently a very slow, human-controlled machine. The gap between expectation and reality is too wide.
It will force competitors to innovate faster. The launch of NEO puts pressure on companies like Tesla and Figure to accelerate their consumer-ready efforts. That's a win for the market overall.
A huge step for the future of home robotics. I'm pre-ordering this immediately. The potential for a real, helpful humanoid assistant outweighs the current limitations. This is a first-generation product and I'm excited to be an early adopter.
It's a huge PR stunt. The whole pre-order and initial press push feels more like a way to secure more investment than a genuine consumer product launch.
Please note:
This action will also remove this member from your connections and send a report to the site admin.
Please allow a few minutes for this process to complete.
Ethics In AI (Guest) –
The legal implications are terrifying. If a remote operator uses the robot to commit a crime or cause serious damage, the legal liability is completely unclear. It's a legal minefield.
CyberSecure Inc. (Guest) –
Not worth the risk of a data breach. The thought of all that highly sensitive home environment data stored on a corporate server is a massive security risk. No matter how much they encrypt it, it's a huge target.
Melissa Young (Guest) –
A huge step for the future of home robotics. I'm pre-ordering this immediately. The potential for a real, helpful humanoid assistant outweighs the current limitations. This is a first-generation product and I'm excited to be an early adopter.
QuietLiving (Guest) –
The quiet operation is a huge plus for a home. A loud, clunky robot would be annoying. The 22 dB noise level makes it a much better fit for a peaceful home environment.
PlugAndPlay (Guest) –
The ability to recharge itself is vital. It being able to walk to a standard wall outlet and plug itself in is a small but crucial detail for a truly autonomous device.
Liability Magazine (Guest) –
The legal implications are terrifying. If a remote operator uses the robot to commit a crime or cause serious damage, the legal liability is completely unclear. It's a legal minefield.
Rebecca Moore (Guest) –
The constant human supervision is a deal-breaker. I was sold on the idea of an AI robot, not a person in a VR headset doing my chores for me. That's a service, not a product.
TechCrunch (Guest) –
It's a huge PR stunt. The whole pre-order and initial press push feels more like a way to secure more investment than a genuine consumer product launch.
Michelle Harris (Guest) –
The subscription is a better deal. I might be willing to pay the $499/month subscription for a few months to try it out, but I'm never dropping $20K upfront on an unproven product.
Industrial Robotics (Guest) –
Hopeful for the use in commercial spaces. Even if it's too expensive for homes now, the technology has immediate applications in warehouses or light industrial settings where privacy is less of an issue.
RiskAssess (Guest) –
The legal implications are terrifying. If a remote operator uses the robot to commit a crime or cause serious damage, the legal liability is completely unclear. It's a legal minefield.
Samuel Clark (Guest) –
The conversational LLM is a great feature. Having an assistant I can talk to naturally while it's physically working is the dream. That conversational AI component is a huge plus.
TeleopIsACheat (Guest) –
The constant human supervision is a deal-breaker. I was sold on the idea of an AI robot, not a person in a VR headset doing my chores for me. That's a service, not a product.
AI_Student (Guest) –
A necessary evil for training the AI. I understand the need for teleoperation to gather data. It's a temporary, but necessary, step to get to a truly autonomous robot. I accept the 'social contract.'
Carol Adams (Guest) –
Too much hype for too little performance. The marketing videos promise a lot, but the reality is currently a very slow, human-controlled machine. The gap between expectation and reality is too wide.
MarketWatch Robotics (Guest) –
It will force competitors to innovate faster. The launch of NEO puts pressure on companies like Tesla and Figure to accelerate their consumer-ready efforts. That's a win for the market overall.
SoftTouchRobo (Guest) –
A soft, welcoming design. It really does look less intimidating than metallic robots like Optimus or Figure. That's a smart choice for a home product.
Timothy Hall (Guest) –
A huge step for the future of home robotics. I'm pre-ordering this immediately. The potential for a real, helpful humanoid assistant outweighs the current limitations. This is a first-generation product and I'm excited to be an early adopter.
WallSt Journal (Guest) –
It's a huge PR stunt. The whole pre-order and initial press push feels more like a way to secure more investment than a genuine consumer product launch.
Ryan Lee (Guest) –
A soft, welcoming design. It really does look less intimidating than metallic robots like Optimus or Figure. That's a smart choice for a home product.